UFV ASC Summarizing a Scholarly Journal Article
Available online at: https://ufv.ca/asc/student-resources/
Students are often required to summarize scholarly journal articles or to base reviews or
critiques or research papers on scholarly sources, all of which require acts of summary.
Summary is one of the most prominent features of academic writing because it gives writers
access to the ideas of others. You will find that most of the academic writing you do will
respond to or be based on the ideas the writing of others.
The guide that follows will introduce you to scholarly summary and describe it as a process.
Scholarly Journal Articles, Research Situations, and Knowledge
Scholarly journals publish research by professional researchers who often study and teach in
universities or other research institutions. Before scholarly articles are published, they are
reviewed by researchers who share the research concerns of your article’s author. This means
that before an article can be published in a scholarly journal it has to be considered worthy of
publication because it meets the scholarly goal of generating new knowledge about a specific
topic. To be published, the article must have taken into account most of what is already
known about a topic. So current research articles are useful because they incorporate
(sometimes explicitly) what is understood about a research question.
Summary Reports; Summary Does not Evaluate
The goal of your summary, then, is to report in a brief and yet accurate manner the main gists
(“gist” refers to the main or essential parts of the article, its main line or lines of reasoning) of
the article. The goal of summary is not to offer an evaluation or opinion of the original
article, but, rather, to report the writer’s main ideas and findings. This means that you will
need to indicate to your reader the writer’s main point or points or purpose for writing. You
will also need to point out how the writer develops or supports his or her main point.
Since one of the goals of summary is to present a far more concise version than the original, it
is not usual to include direct quotes from the original or even to include very many specific,
concrete details from the original, though you may need to include one or two brief examples
that illustrate the writer’s main point or points. Think of a summary as the child of the
original document: fully formed and able to make sense and stand on its own, a new text, not
exactly the same as its original, but bearing the features of its parental origins, so much so
that anyone who sees the summary might be heard to remark, “Oh, you have your parents’
main features; you even sound like your parents, but you are much shorter!”
CONTACT: [email protected] www.ufv.ca/asc
604-854-4573 or (Chilliwack CEP) 604-504-7441 ext. 2432
Summarizing a
Scholarly Journal Article
UFV ASC Summarizing a Scholarly Journal Article
How to Produce a Small Child from an Unwieldy Parent, or
the Process of Summarizing a Scholarly Journal Article
To begin, flip through the entire article, noting any headings the author may have used
to indicate main sections or topic shifts in the article. These headings reflect the writer’s
organization or structure in the article. Pay special attention to the title of the article; it
should indicate the writer’s topic and approach to that topic. If you can get a sense of how
the writer has structured the information in her article, you are well on your way to
summarizing it.
Read the abstract at the beginning of the article if there is one. The abstract is an even
more concise summary of the article than the summary you will do.
Read the article through once to capture the gists of the article, its main ideas. You are
reading here to get a sense of the writer’s topic and the important relationships or
connections between the parts of the article. Understanding these connections is necessary
to write a coherent summary.
Read the article again in a far more active way: this involves note taking (by making
notes in the margins of the paper to capture essential ideas) and sorting more abstract,
general information or ideas from detailed, concrete information (by highlighting these
different kinds of information with differently-coloured highlighter pens).
You have five goals in this note-taking process:
 to make note of the writer’s main ideas which will usually be general and abstract
 to make note of the more detailed description of examples or cases that help the
writer to interpret or analyze the more general, abstract ideas she is attempting to
work with
 to notice the distinction between abstract and detailed information (by
highlighting each in different colours!)
 to capture the connections between important ideas
5. to make note of important ideas in shorthand form: don’t copy the writer’s words
into the margin, but retain key words, translating the writer’s complex ideas into
nuggets of information
As you take notes, keep in mind that you are actively sorting through the text for
important ideas that will need to appear in the summary to accurately represent the
writer’s ideas, leaving behind information that is too detailed, that if retained would
extend the summary, making it far too long.
Summary cannot capture all of the abstract ideas within an article and the detailed
supporting material which the writer includes to help the reader to interpret those abstract
concepts or ideas. Neither can summary report all of the technical terminology of the
original, though it should retain some of the key terminology. After all, your summary has
CONTACT: [email protected] www.ufv.ca/asc
604-854-4573 or (Chilliwack CEP) 604-504-7441 ext. 2432
UFV ASC Summarizing a Scholarly Journal Article
to resemble its source.
This suggests that summary involves acts of sorting (general, abstract concepts from
detailed examples or cases), acts of connecting important ideas, and acts of translation
(rephrasing complex ideas into more concise, portable forms), which can make a long,
complicated document accessible for use.
Remember that the goal of summary is to produce a handsome, fully formed, coherent text
that bears an accurate relationship to its original, presenting it in a much briefer form.
Look for connections between the nuggets of information that emerged from the note-
taking process and write a first draft of your summary.
As you write the first draft of your summary, you will likely notice that the writer has
located important ideas and the connections between them at various places in the article.
Because of this, you may not be able to summarize the article in the same linear pattern of
the original. You may notice for example, that the most important point the writer makes is
located in her final paragraph. This would then need to come forward in your summary;
your reader would look for it near the beginning. You may also notice that between main
ideas, and between material that connects one main idea to another, may be located several
paragraphs of detailed description. Your summary does not need to capture all of the
detailed description, but it should capture the connection between ideas, suggesting that you
shouldn’t expect to retain a key idea from every paragraph of the original article.
Remember, too, that retaining some detailed examples or descriptions from the original may
help your reader make a strong connection to the original article. Be cautious, though, in the
amount of detail you bring into your summary. Too much will bog down your summary and
obscure the writer’s main ideas that you are attempting to report.
Read the draft of your summary to someone who has not read the original article. Ask
him or her to let you know if it makes sense. Above all, your summary needs to be a
coherent document that both makes sense on its own and accurately reflects its
original source.
Express your summary in a scholarly style. This involves introducing your source in a
scholarly way, describing what kind of writing your source is and its main finding, and
keeping in touch with your source throughout your summary.
See annotated example on next page...
CONTACT: [email protected] www.ufv.ca/asc
604-854-4573 or (Chilliwack CEP) 604-504-7441 ext. 2432
UFV ASC Summarizing a Scholarly Journal Article
Here is an example of a summary that displays a scholarly style:
Susan McDonald’s Professional
Academic Writing in the Humanities
and Social Sciences (1994) is a cross-
disciplinary study which articulates
epistemological differences in
disciplinary practice as they manifest
through recurrent rhetorical practices.
To help clarify differences in
knowledge-making practices, she
identifies four patterns of variation in
epistemological practice within
disciplines that range from scientific to
humanistic.
The Academic Success Centre has online and tutoring resources available to help you
with writing in a variety of disciplines, understanding and producing MLA, APA, and
Chicago styles of citing sources, and documenting your academic work. Check our
website for links and more information.
CONTACT: [email protected] www.ufv.ca/asc
604-854-4573 or (Chilliwack CEP) 604-504-7441 ext. 2432
scholarly writers keep in
touch with their source,
“she,” i.e., MacDonald,
and use reporting lan-
guage, e.g., “identifies
scholarly
writers
name the
kind of writ-
ing they are
summarizing
scholarly writers name
the texts they summa-
rize and the dates those
texts were published
scholarly
writers
name their
sources
scholarly writers de-
scribe their source’s
main finding or conclu-
sion